Strengths and weaknesses of quantitative research

Based on this Ragin (1989) opined that a researcher who applied the synthetic approach would reap more benefits from their research, since this approach to investigation provided the opportunity for the compartivists to monitor of intricate relationships of several and hypothetical causation.Analysis Qualitative research relies on specific evidence rather than generalized research.Furthermore, Keaty (2008) stated that the comparative approach is the primary scientific process existing, that an individual can utilise to control theories and analyse the correlations of more than one variable, while maintaining all invariance that can latently alter factors.The objective of this methodology is equally past construe and fundamental rational.

Quantitative research methods. strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and.Instead the researcher depends on numbers and statistics to prove a hypothesis.An example of a quantitative comparative study would be Bronschier and others (1978) study of developed countries that had an advanced level of local investment economies grew quicker.However, it proposes an account for specific results of occurrences of exceptions.The process of borrowing and analysing educational systems across countries are very important for the existence of this field.You must try to find frequencies, magnitudes, structures, processes, causes and consequences.

Quantitative Research Design Flashcards | Quizlet

Extended case method - a technique in which case study observations are used to discover flaws in and to improve existing social theories.

Main Page Help Browse Cookbook Wikijunior Featured books Recent changes Donations Random book Using Wikibooks.

PPT – Qualitative Field Research PowerPoint presentation

When the qualitative approach is defined in mainstream social science Creswell (1998) stated that it is an investigative procedure of comprehending rooted on clear customs of inquisition that investigates a societal or human dilemma.Personal connections are often especially important when deviant or elite populations are being studied.Ragain (1989) defined this approach as being established on theory.Therefore it may be assumed that the comparative approach involves the studying of one society and comparing it to more than one case (society) based on their societal factors such as culture, politics, etc., and determining their similarities and differences and attributing them to why phenomenon exists in the society being analysed.The qualitative approach in mainstream social science is advantageous.The main purpose of the comparative approach in this field of study is to construct a justification of worldwide trends that are common to these societies but also allows researchers to analyse the more intricate trends of a society Ragain (1987).

Research Methods - University of Kentucky

Green, A., Preston. J and J,G. 2006.Janmaat. Education, equality and social cohesion.However, one must be cognisant that the divergences that exist among the quantitative and qualitative approaches to the comparative approach are great and not simply conciliated.Researchers of the qualitative comparative approach also are condemned because they tend to be concerned with hypothesises which are unrelated to cases being examined, therefore this results in findings which are not truly linked to the instigative enquiries.Discuss The Strengths And Weaknesses Of Qualitative Field Research.

Finally the whole procedure that is carried out in this approach does not clearly depict what the investigator procedures and how they made their deductions (Bryman 2001).It does this through explicit knowledge, tacit knowledge, and thick description.Mahooney and Ruechemeyer (2003) noted that this approach is a primary type of investigation that is applied in the social science.The researcher can be entirely an outside observer, never interacting directly with the subject, or be entirely in the group and part of the group they are researching, or any level in between these two extremes.Also this methodology necessitates that the researcher defers suppositions concerning the similarity of subjects and situations.Fourthly and finally it supports enhanced global comprehending and collaboration owing to augmented understanding to various beliefs and traditions of the world.It utilizes a graph (diagraph) for display, and ties between individuals are represented as edges (arcs) in this graph.

Participatory Action Research - an approach to social research in which the people being studied are given control over the purpose and procedures of the research.Bereday (1964) stated that during this phase great importance was focused on the categorisation of explanatory facts.

Issues in using methodological triangulation in research

Wiborg, S. 2004. Education and social integration: a comparative study of the Comprehensive School System in Scandinavia.

Furthermore, the other reason for this merger between fields is the noticeable interest in quantitative and experiential and approaches of investigation (Noah and Eckstein 1969).Four stages of constant comparative method (Glaser and Strauss).

List several ways in which qualitative research differs from quantitative research in psychology.Reference will then be made the three stages the comparative approach evolved in education and the major principles that the comparative approach is hinged on.As such, statistics are produced which is fictitious and inappropriate to distinct situations (Picciano 2004).

The Difference Between Quantitative Research Methodology

Smelser, N.J. 1973. The methodology of comparative analysis. In D. P. Warwick and S.Observing this approach to the nomothetic form of analysis entails that investigators contemplate such principles to be worldwide, despite of dissimilarities that exist.In the general sense it may be assumed that all social scientific methods are comparative.The advantages and disadvantages of qualitative research are as follows.

It links the microlevel of everyday personal experiences with the macrolevel of institutions.For example, quantitative research allows a researcher to objectively detail evidence.Qualitative research. is designed to reveal the meaning that informs the action or outcomes that are typically measured by quantitative research.Our free online Harvard Referencing Tool makes referencing easy.In the broad field of sociology the comparative approach may be defined as relating to a type of evaluation that contrasts one ideology or investigative plan aligned with others.

Ragin (1989) further purported that the comparative approach is a rational approach and as a result it is hinged on John Stuart Mills (1888) principles of inductive inquiry.And ultimately, since the results are not presented statistically some researchers will view the results as insufficient to provide valuable proof and furthermore being an assault to the truth.Ethnomethodology - an approach to the study of social life that focuses on the discovery of implicit, usually unspoken, assumptions and agreement.Institutional Ethnography - a research technique in which the personal experiences of individuals are used to reveal power relationships and other characteristics of the institution within which they operate.

1013 Strengths and Limitations of Case Studies

However, some researches in this field of study have developed the position over the years that there is no uniqueness about this field of inquiry.The final method that Mill (1888) defined, that the comparative approach is grounded on, is the indirect method of agreement.

This study was used to investigate the behaviours of vegetarians who were said to be abnormal and as a consequence were considered with scepticism and resentment.They are quantitative research,. quantitative variables vary in degree or amount.

What is Mixed Methods Research?

Furthermore he opined that the qualitative comparative approach seeks to determine and analyse the association among perceptible interactions throughout various nations, and extensive hypothetically established descriptions of worldwide societal trends, as opposed to trying to comprehend explicit results.Swanson, G. 1971. Framework for comparative research: structural anthropology and the Theory of Action. In I. Vallier (ed), Comparative Methods in Sociology: Essays on trends and applications (pg. 141-202). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Qualitative Market Research Vs Quantitative Market Research

The use of a mixed method is also applied in the field of education.

After that emphasis was placed on contrasting the information collected in an effort to determine the preeminent traditions that a country was using with the purpose of implementing them in other countries.However, a researcher must disclose their researcher role when observing in private locations.A researcher needs a concrete hypothesis and needs to know the type of research involved---such as questionnaires and test questions.These investigators employ this style chiefly to determine causation about macro-level methods and systems.However within comparative education they are some researchers who prefer to adopt the qualitative comparative approach, and therefore insist that this method is applied.Strengths Of Quantitative Research. strengths and weaknesses.

Proudly powered by Wordpress